|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

Josef Djugashvilis
2903
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 14:23:52 -
[1] - Quote
Javajunky wrote:I'm going to say I'm somewhat disappointed, but I shall return to comment after I go throw up.
Constructive feed back = best feed back.
This is not a signature.
|

Josef Djugashvilis
2904
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 18:00:10 -
[2] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Aralyn Cormallen wrote: Its actually better for us if the people who we want to greif time away from our chosen Prime, since the guys having to play "defender" wont be strung out also by going on the offense, instead you'll have our fresh other timezones with literally nothing better to do. lulz See everytime something someting changes in the game and null residents raise issues about it, "others" (mainly high sec types) rush in and proclaim how the 'tears are delicious'. What they NEVER seem to understand is that null residents are adapters, no matter what CCP throws at them, they fine a way to keep on truckin. What really happens though, is that in some way, the people who were celebrating 'tears' end up being the only people who end up suffering from whatever change is being discussed. It's happening here (well, in general discussion anyways), people are proclaiming how this will be great for the game and the goons/N3/bi guys are gonna suffer and the coalations will collapse and the 'little guy' will have a chance. What they don't (and never) see coming is that the big groups will survive and find a way to profit, the little guys will still be sad and the high sec people celebrating will not be subject to BORED GOONS who don't have to be in null because their alliances prime time is in another Time Zones....which means even more ganking and tomfoolery  Tears aren't the things that are delicious. The thing that is delicious is IRONY.
Well played Jenn!
An entire thread about null-sec and you still manage to whinge about hi-sec.
That takes some mind set to do 
This is not a signature.
|

Josef Djugashvilis
2907
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 15:55:59 -
[3] - Quote
Moac Tor wrote:Dracvlad wrote:Please stop Kaarous! *chuckles* Never going to happen
Whilst I undersatand the sentiment, I do not want Kararous to stop.
It never fails to amuse me that no matter what the source to the contrary, from CCP down, dear Kaarous can always find some metric to claim that hi-sec folk are spoilt rotten and that null-sec folk are on their uppers relatively speaking.
If null-sec corp bosses keep most of the dosh for themselves, why should anyone not affected care?
This is not a signature.
|

Josef Djugashvilis
2911
|
Posted - 2015.03.08 00:36:17 -
[4] - Quote
Alp Khan wrote...
I'm telling you that even a newbie highsec L4 mission runner on a battleship, through chosing the optimal faction to do missions for, easily nearly doubles the 52M ISK per hour that an Ishtar pilot can make in null.
I earn more than this running level 4 missions in my trusty Velator armed with civilian mining lasers !
Jeez, I sure do feel sorry for all you null-sec paupers.
This is not a signature.
|

Josef Djugashvilis
2911
|
Posted - 2015.03.08 18:23:38 -
[5] - Quote
lilol' me wrote:I have to say if anyone is going to kill eve off its ccp fozzie. Completely clueless. Sorry.
I doubt CCP Foggie works alone, it is probably a team effort for good or bad. 
This is not a signature.
|

Josef Djugashvilis
2911
|
Posted - 2015.03.08 18:56:45 -
[6] - Quote
[quote=lilol' me]I have to say if anyone is going to kill eve off its ccp fozzie. Completely clueless. Sorry.[/quote
I thought CCP Greyscale was responsible for killing the game?
This is not a signature.
|

Josef Djugashvilis
2913
|
Posted - 2015.03.10 08:10:17 -
[7] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Dracvlad wrote: I was able to earn 108m an hour in Cobalt Edge with a carrier and oracle on grid Wow, 108 mil per hour (54 mil per hour per toon). Nice. In high sec you can use a Mach and make 86 mil per hour doing lvl 3 missions while being protected by CONCORD. So for the cost of using TWO characters and a CAPITAL SHIP that takes months to train for, and while flying in space where the space police won't help you, you get a whopping, mind blowing 22 million isk extra per hour total. Thanks for helping us empirically demonstrate the imbalances we were discussing, imbalances that end up distorting everything ccp tries to do with null sec.
Jeez Jenn, let it go man.
CCP ain't listening to you.
This is not a signature.
|

Josef Djugashvilis
2913
|
Posted - 2015.03.10 14:09:29 -
[8] - Quote
Lord Zeuus wrote:CCP if you're listening:
Delayed local in Null No Fleet Warps Supers that have no real DPS use SOV that can be taken by a frigate
if those are goals that become reality then I'm out.
Your can only work if you threaten to unsub your zillion alts as well.
This is not a signature.
|

Josef Djugashvilis
2913
|
Posted - 2015.03.10 22:10:12 -
[9] - Quote
Post deleted, why make fun of Dear Jenny yet again...
This is not a signature.
|

Josef Djugashvilis
2913
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 07:15:59 -
[10] - Quote
Dear Alp Khan, my friend knows someone who met someone who said that he earns billions of isk in null by ratting in a cruiser.
Thr above sentence is about a scientific as the claims that Jenn, Karrous and La 'The Scientist' Nariz make.
CCP have frequently shown that Null is doing very nicely in terms of rat bounties etc.
If CCP ever decide that they are indeed unbalanced, they will do something about it.
What some in null do not seem to understand is that some of us simply do not like the ego wars etc in null.
This is not a signature.
|
|

Josef Djugashvilis
2914
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 20:49:10 -
[11] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Alp Khan wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Dear Alp Khan, my friend knows someone who met someone who said that he earns billions of isk in null by ratting in a cruiser.
Unironically, that pretty much seems like the only thing you can credibly say about the whole individual income debate. And mind you, your post is deceptive, you are projecting yourself onto the people who avoid word of mouth and talk of their own experiences. Why? Because the posters who openly say that null individual income is the worst in EVE back it up with figures. They compare it to wormholes, low-sec FW and highsec L4s and incursions and find it to be minuscule in comparison with even highsec. Their figures and math show the obvious conclusion that can also reach through calculations. On the other hand, I haven't seen you provide figures so far. You haven't provided a coherent argument either. In the absence of those, you will find it difficult to be taken seriously by your peers. You're replying to someone who is the actual poster child for "don't touch my high sec income" (he even admitted it, he makes isk in high sec for pvp ships he uses in low sec). The problem is that such people are so incredibly short sighted it's not even funny. they don't get that the imbalance hurts them (with people who WOULD be in null living instead being in other parts of EVE doing things that pay out in LP, that lowers the incomes of the Josef Djugashvilis' of high sec...). I stopped being surprised by what you describe a long time ago. This happened when I noticed that EVERY high sec vs null (or anywhere else) discussion was comprised of non-high sec types with facts and figures and personal experiences on one side, and on the other side was 'high sec' aka 'a friend I know told me he makes 7 trillion isk per hour just by jumping into null and shooting one rat' lol. In other words, they think we are as greedy as they are (that's psychological projection for you), so they think we're trying to nerf them to hurt them when the real truth is that a proper balance benefits everyone as much as an imbalance screws everyone. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to cash in some more Federation Customs and Khanid Navy LPs that I got form NOT being in null sec where I should have been.
Dear, dear Jenn, CCP still ain't listening.
And CCP have acess to the facts, not the opinion of you and a few other malcontents.
Lordy, I only wish I did earn 100B plus per hour running missions in hi-sec to pay for my lo-sec pvp failures.
Fly safe 
This is not a signature.
|
|
|
|